Title
Bridging HIV Prevention and Care Gaps Among Papua New Guinea and Pacific Migrant Populations in Australia: A Mixed-Methods Study to Support HIV Elimination by 2030
1. Background
Australia has made major progress toward HIV elimination through:
Widespread testing
Antiretroviral therapy (ART)
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
However, inequities persist:
Migrants (especially from high-prevalence countries) experience:
Lower PrEP uptake
Higher late diagnosis rates
Reduced access to care
Papua New Guinea (PNG):
Higher HIV burden
Strong migration link with Australia
👉 Key issue: HIV is controlled nationally, but not equally across populations.
2. Problem Statement
PNG and Pacific migrants in Australia face:
Structural barriers (e.g., Medicare ineligibility)
Cultural stigma and discrimination
Limited access to HIV prevention and testing
👉 Result:
Delayed diagnosis
Poor engagement in care
Risk to Australia’s HIV elimination goal
3. Aim
To identify and address barriers to HIV prevention, testing, and treatment among PNG and Pacific migrant populations in Australia.
4. Objectives
Assess disparities in HIV prevention (PrEP uptake)
Examine HIV testing patterns and late diagnosis
Identify barriers to treatment access and adherence
Explore social and cultural determinants of care
Develop culturally appropriate intervention strategies
5. Research Questions
Why is PrEP uptake low among PNG/Pacific migrants?
What causes delayed HIV diagnosis?
How do stigma and cultural beliefs affect care?
How does healthcare access influence outcomes?
What interventions can improve HIV service delivery?
6. Significance
Australia
Supports HIV elimination targets
Reduces health inequities
PNG & Indo-Pacific
Strengthens regional health collaboration
Addresses migrant health challenges
Global
Contributes to UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals
7. Innovation
Focus on PNG/Pacific migrants (under-researched group)
Combines:
Epidemiology
Community-based research
Policy translation
Includes co-designed interventions, not just analysis
8. Theoretical Framework
Social Determinants of Health
HIV Care Continuum (Cascade Model)
Intersectionality Theory
👉 Allows analysis of structural + cultural + individual factors
9. Methodology
Design
Mixed-methods (Sequential Explanatory)
Phase 1: Quantitative
National HIV datasets
Compare:
Australian-born vs migrant populations
Methods:
Regression analysis
Trend analysis
Phase 2: Qualitative
Interviews with:
PNG/Pacific migrants
Healthcare providers
Thematic analysis
Phase 3: Intervention
Community-based co-design
Develop:
HIV testing model OR
PrEP access strategy
10. Expected Outcomes
Identification of key barriers
Policy recommendations
Culturally appropriate HIV intervention model
3–5 journal publications
11. Impact
Academic:
Contribution to HIV and migrant health research
Policy:
Inform national HIV strategies
Community:
Improve access and outcomes for PNG/Pacific migrants
12. Feasibility
Data available nationally
Strong research support at Griffith University
Clear 3-year structure
13. Timeline (Summary)
Year 1: Literature + quantitative analysis
Year 2: Qualitative study
Year 3: Intervention + writing
14. Why This Proposal is Strong for RTP
✔ National priority (HIV elimination)
✔ Equity focus (migrant health)
✔ Regional relevance (PNG–Australia)
✔ Strong methodology
✔ Clear real-world impact
👉 Supervisors to contact now:
Cordia Chu, Bernadette Sebar, and Lennert Veerman for RTP funding success.
Comments
Post a Comment